The concept of an “inoperative community” was developed by the French philosopher Jean-Luc Nancy. In his work, Nancy critically engages with traditional notions of community and proposes an alternative understanding that challenges the idea of a fully functioning, self-sufficient community. Instead, he argues for a conception of community that acknowledges its inherent incompleteness and inoperativity. Nancy suggests that traditional notions of community tend to be grounded in a sense of totality and unity, where individuals are seen as parts of a whole. This understanding often assumes that communities are self-sustaining and able to achieve a common purpose or goal. However, Nancy argues that this idealized notion of community overlooks the essential aspects of multiplicity, difference, and the inherent finitude of human existence.
According to Nancy, the idea of an inoperative community arises from the recognition that communities are never fully realized or complete. He emphasizes the irreducible plurality of individuals and the impossibility of achieving complete unity or identity within a community. Instead, he suggests that communities are always in the process of becoming, constantly open to change and transformation. Nancy’s notion of inoperativity refers to the idea that communities do not operate or function in the way that a machine or a system does. He argues against the idea of community as a closed, self-contained entity with fixed roles and functions. Instead, he proposes an understanding of community that allows for the emergence of new meanings, relationships, and possibilities. Inoperative communities are characterized by openness, porosity, and the constant negotiation of differences. For Nancy, inoperativity is not a negative or passive state, but rather an active and dynamic condition. It involves a shared sense of vulnerability and exposure to the other, as well as an openness to the unknown and the unpredictable. Inoperative communities embrace the uncertainty and ambiguity that arise from the encounter with others, and they acknowledge the impossibility of achieving total harmony or consensus.
Nancy’s concept of inoperative community has significant implications for our understanding of politics, ethics, and social relations. It challenges the idea that communities can be based on fixed identities or exclusionary principles. Instead, it emphasizes the need for openness, dialogue, and the recognition of difference in the construction of more inclusive and responsive forms of community. By embracing inoperativity, Nancy invites us to reimagine community as a space of encounter, vulnerability, and transformative potential.
Also read; A short note on Theatre-in-the-round